Refund - Excess payment of tax - Sales tax
Court :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Brief :
Refund - Excess payment of tax - Sales tax - Tax paid at 1% on gold - Rate of tax reduced retrospectively - Refund of excess paid tax rejected on the ground that notification barring refund of tax collected at higher rate - Excess tax must be refunded - Doctrine of unjust enrichment not applicable as no averment that excess tax passed on to purchasers - Statutory provision providing for refund to prevail over notification - Condition on non-refund repealed by necessary implication as rate reduced with retrospective effect - State directed to refund excess amount with interest @ 10% instead of appellant refunding amount and claiming from State - Interest to be paid @ 15% if amount not refunded within four months - Section 44 of Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. [paras 5, 19, 22, 23, 24, 27]
Citation :
2009 (233) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.B. Sinha and Cyriac Joseph, JJ.
CORPORATION BANK
Versus
SARASWATI ABHARANSALA
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713
Arbind Aggarwal
Published in Excise
Views : 4623
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Browse by Category
CA Articles
Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants
Pune
CA Inter
View Details
Article Assistant
MANUJ SHARMA AND COMPANY
Noida
CA Inter
View Details
CCI
Pro
CAclubindia
