Rebate claim on duty By Ranbaxy u/sec 11BB Central Excise Act, 1944


Last updated: 25 October 2011

Court :
SC

Brief :
Ranbaxy field claim for interest u/sec 11BB - Rejected by CCE - Appeal - entitled interest under sec 11BB- Assistant commissioner field revision application and ministry of finance held that appellant was not entitle to interest u/s 11BB - field write petition in high court - held not entitled - supreme court ordered excise officer shall determine the amount of interest payable u/sec 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

Citation :
RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Nilesh
Published in Excise
Views : 4528
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. Supreme Court affirms the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act: No ITC to the recipient unless the supplier actually deposits tax to the Government
  2. No Addition under Income Tax Law on Bogus Purchases, Where Sales Are Accepted and Supplies Are Backed by GST Records and Banking Trail
  3. Voluntary Tax Payment Does Not Bar Proceedings Under Section 74 Where Suppression Allegation Remains Uncontested
  4. Appellate Authority Cannot Pass "Copy-Paste" Orders Without Independent Application of Mind
  5. Audit Closure Bars Reopening of Same Issues Under Section 73
  6. Big Relief ITC Cannot Be Denied to a Bona Fide Purchaser Merely Because the Supplier's Registration Cancelled Retrospectively
  7. ITC Cannot Be Denied Solely on the Ground that the Supplier was Subsequently Declared Non-Existent, Without Examining the Documentary Evidence Furnished by the Assessee
  8. GSTAT to Examine Whether Mandatory Pre-Deposit is Payable on Penalty Order Only Passed Prior to October 1, 2025
  9. No Further Pre-Deposit is Required Before the Appellate Tribunal Where the Amount Already Deposited Before the First Appellate Authority Exceeds the Specified Limit of Pre-Deposit Payable on the Reduced Demand
  10. Corporate Guarantee Without Consideration Not Taxable Under GST

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member TaxletTaxletPro Member P.S.HarishankarP.S.HarishankarPro Member ATUL MAKWANAATUL MAKWANAPro Member Dinesh KotwaniDinesh KotwaniPro Member Krishnan VKrishnan V
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Follow us
add to google news

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
Semi Qualified Company Secretary

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CS

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

G A R U D & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 July 2026
Article Assistants

R Shyam and Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
CA Article

Pipara & Co. LLP.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 10 July 2026
Article Assistant

N S Gokhale & Co

Thane

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 July 2026
Article

Gianender & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details