Pr. CIT cannot substitute his view with that of the AO u/s. 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act

Last updated: 10 February 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) cannot simply substitute their own opinion for that of the Assessing Officer (AO) when reviewing an assessment made under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that the AO's assessment order was not erroneous or detrimental to the revenue's interests. The case involved scrutiny of construction expenses for a property.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
With this appeal the appellant has challenged the assumption of jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Act, 1961 by the Pr. CIT-10, New Delhi.

Citation :
ITA No.2040/DEL/2015

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 204
downloaded 282 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal
  2. Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
  3. Appellate Authority has no power to condone delay in filing appeal beyond the outer limit prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act
  4. CESTAT New Delhi: Sub-Contractor Separately Liable for Service Tax Regardless of Main Contractor's Discharge
  5. Cenvat Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely on Third-Party Statements Without Corroborative Evidence
  6. CESTAT: Service Tax Not Leviable on Unclaimed Amounts Written Off Without Evidence of Taxable Service
  7. Partners of a Partnership Firm are personally liable for GST dues of the Firm and bank account of an erstwhile partner can be attached for recovery
  8. Prima facie satisfaction and not conclusive proof of fraud is sufficient to invoke Section 74 of the CGST Act
  9. Show Cause Notice issued to a non-existent amalgamated company is void ab initio and cannot be saved by Section 87 of the CGST Act
  10. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member ShakthiShakthiPro Member chandradhass sathishchandradhass sathishPro Member Rahul KulkarniRahul KulkarniPro Member Ravi VarshneyRavi VarshneyPro Member saravanakumarsaravanakumar
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
13 August 2026
Chartered Accountant (FP&A)

Client of Trellis Consulting

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
18 August 2026
Audit Assistant - Remote / Work From Home

CA ANOOP P K & ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Manager / Senior Manager - Statutory Audit

CommerceCareer

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
18 August 2026
CA Semi Qualifies

Goyanka and Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Finance Manager

Resollect Technologies Pvt Ltd

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 August 2026
Article Assistant

N J Suresh & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant - Financial Consolidation & Reporting

Synergy Keystone

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Pvt Ltd

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details