Order in contravention of the provisions of S. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Last updated: 03 June 2021
Quick Summary
This appeal concerns an order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the assessee claims contravened Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee argues that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the Assessing Officer's actions, including converting a limited scrutiny assessment to a complete one without justification. Furthermore, the appeal challenges the disallowance of expenses due to alleged non-deduction of TDS, even when payments were below the threshold, and disputes ad-hoc additions for development expenses.

Court :
ITAT Chandigarh

Brief :
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 26.04.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].

Citation :
ITA No. 982/C HD /2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation
  2. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  3. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  4. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  5. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  6. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  7. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  8. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  9. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  10. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Jai SolankiJai SolankiPro Member poojaambedepoojaambedePro Member Omkar KarmbelkarOmkar KarmbelkarPro Member SARANGSARANGPro Member Rishi JainRishi Jain
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category