banner_ad

M/s Trianz Holdings Pvt Ltd , Bangalore vs Deputy Commissioner of Income TAx Circle-7(1)(1), Bangalore


Last updated: 17 December 2020

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 27.09.2017 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.

Citation :
IT(TP)A No.2522/Bang/2017

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCHES “C”, BANGALORE

Before Shri George George K, JM & Shri B.R.Baskaran, AM
IT(TP)A No.2522/Bang/2017 : Asst.Year 2013-2014

M/s.Trianz Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
#165/2, 6th Floor, Kalyani
Magnum, Doraisanipalaya, IIM
Post, Bannerghatta Road
Bangalore – 560 076.
PAN : AAFAC8051P.
(Appellant) 

v.

The Dy.Commissioner of
Income-tax, Circle 7(1)(1)
Bangalore.
(Respondent)

Appellant by : Sri.K.R.Vasudevan, Advocate
Respondent by : Sri.Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR
Date of Hearing : 15.12.2020
Date of 
Pronouncement : 15.12.2020

O R D E R

Per George George K, JM

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 27.09.2017 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follow: The assessee is a company engaged in the business of providing information technology services. For the assessment year 2013-2014, the return of income was filed on 19.11.2013 declaring loss of Rs.5,55,17,930. The assessment was taken up for scrutiny by issuing of notice u/s 143(2) of the I.T.Act. During the course of assessment proceedings, the matter was referred to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the Arm’s Length Price (ALP) of International Transaction undertaken by the assessee with its holding company in U.S.A. After considering the assessee’s objection, the total adjustment made u/s 92CA of the I.T.Act was Rs.28,27,00,781. The Assessing Officer included the arm’s length adjustment in the draft assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(1) of the I.T.Act. The assessee aggrieved, filed the objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The DRP vide its order dated 21.08.2017 did not give any relief on this issue to the assessee.Consequently, directions of the DRP with regard to adjustmentmade to the ALP was incorporated in the final assessment order dated 27.09.2017.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

 

CCI Pro

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details