LLPs are not covered under the definition of 'body corporate' not liable to pay service


Last updated: 06 August 2021

Court :
CESTAT, New Delhi

Brief :
In the matter of SRL Advisors LLP v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi [Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021], SRL Advisors LLP ('the Appellant') was incorporated as a limited liability partnership/entity ('LLP') under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 ('the LLP Act') and registered under the Service tax laws. The Appellant was rendering services including manpower services up to March 31, 2013. For rendering the manpower supply services, the Appellant also received manpower supply services from V. Search HR Consultancy Services, a partnership firm up to February 28, 2013. Thereafter, the Appellant engaged their own employees.

Citation :
Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021

In the matter of SRL Advisors LLP v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi [Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021], SRL Advisors LLP ('the Appellant') was incorporated as a limited liability partnership/entity ('LLP') under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 ('the LLP Act') and registered under the Service tax laws. The Appellant was rendering services including manpower services up to March 31, 2013. For rendering the manpower supply services, the Appellant also received manpower supply services from V. Search HR Consultancy Services, a partnership firm up to February 28, 2013. Thereafter, the Appellant engaged their own employees.

The Appellant filed refund application dated December 02, 2013, online and manually on December 13, 2013, for refund of erroneous payment of service tax amounting to Rs. 2,23,913/-.

The Appellant contended that, being an LLP is not covered in definition of ‘body corporate’ and hence not liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism ('RCM'), as applicable to a body corporate in terms of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June, 2012.

The Customs, Excise & Service tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ('CESTAT') analyzed that, Rule 2(bc) of Service Tax Rules, refers to the meaning of ‘body corporate’ in Section 2(7) of the Companies Act, 1956, wherein any other body corporate which includes an LLP is specifically excluded from the definition of body corporate.

The CESTAT held that, the Appellant as an LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the RCM during the period from January 04, 2013, to March 30, 2013. The Appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under RCM, as per the refund application. 

Directed the Revenue Department, to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of order with interest for the period starting after three months from the date of refund application till the date of grant of refund.

 

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details