LLPs are not covered under the definition of 'body corporate' not liable to pay service


Quick Summary
The Customs, Excise & Service tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is not considered a 'body corporate' for the purposes of paying service tax under the reverse charge mechanism. This decision means LLPs are not liable to pay service tax in such situations. Consequently, SRL Advisors LLP was deemed entitled to a refund of service tax paid erroneously.

Court :
CESTAT, New Delhi

Brief :
In the matter of SRL Advisors LLP v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi [Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021], SRL Advisors LLP ('the Appellant') was incorporated as a limited liability partnership/entity ('LLP') under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 ('the LLP Act') and registered under the Service tax laws. The Appellant was rendering services including manpower services up to March 31, 2013. For rendering the manpower supply services, the Appellant also received manpower supply services from V. Search HR Consultancy Services, a partnership firm up to February 28, 2013. Thereafter, the Appellant engaged their own employees.

Citation :
Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021

In the matter of SRL Advisors LLP v. Commissioner of Central Tax, Delhi [Service Tax Appeal No. 51221 of 2018-SM and Final Order No. 51688 of 2021 decided on July 28, 2021], SRL Advisors LLP ('the Appellant') was incorporated as a limited liability partnership/entity ('LLP') under the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 ('the LLP Act') and registered under the Service tax laws. The Appellant was rendering services including manpower services up to March 31, 2013. For rendering the manpower supply services, the Appellant also received manpower supply services from V. Search HR Consultancy Services, a partnership firm up to February 28, 2013. Thereafter, the Appellant engaged their own employees.

The Appellant filed refund application dated December 02, 2013, online and manually on December 13, 2013, for refund of erroneous payment of service tax amounting to Rs. 2,23,913/-.

The Appellant contended that, being an LLP is not covered in definition of ‘body corporate’ and hence not liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism ('RCM'), as applicable to a body corporate in terms of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June, 2012.

The Customs, Excise & Service tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ('CESTAT') analyzed that, Rule 2(bc) of Service Tax Rules, refers to the meaning of ‘body corporate’ in Section 2(7) of the Companies Act, 1956, wherein any other body corporate which includes an LLP is specifically excluded from the definition of body corporate.

The CESTAT held that, the Appellant as an LLP, is not required to pay service tax under the RCM during the period from January 04, 2013, to March 30, 2013. The Appellant is entitled to refund of the service tax paid erroneously under RCM, as per the refund application. 

Directed the Revenue Department, to grant refund within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of order with interest for the period starting after three months from the date of refund application till the date of grant of refund.

FAQ :

The main issue was whether a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) was considered a 'body corporate' and therefore liable to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism.

The CESTAT referred to Rule 2(bc) of the Service Tax Rules, which in turn refers to Section 2(7) of the Companies Act, 1956.

No, the definition of 'body corporate' under Section 2(7) of the Companies Act, 1956 specifically excludes LLPs.

No, the CESTAT held that SRL Advisors LLP, as an LLP, was not required to pay service tax under the reverse charge mechanism during the specified period.

Yes, the CESTAT ruled that SRL Advisors LLP is entitled to a refund of the service tax paid erroneously under the reverse charge mechanism.

The Revenue Department was directed to grant the refund within 45 days from the receipt of the order, along with interest if the refund is delayed beyond three months from the application date.

 



Judgement posted by

Service

FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more

Comments




CCI Pro



Company
ARTICLESHIP 18 September 2026
Industrial Trainee

Twenty Point Nine Five Ventures Private Limited

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 October 2026
ARTICLE TRAINEE

S.B.G. & CO. CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 September 2026
CA/Semi-CA/BCom

Pravin Sarvaiya

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article Trainee/ CMA Trainee

RMA And Associates LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
AUDIT , ACCOUNTS AND TAXATION

KDSS

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
Accounts and Tax Associate

POOJA R TELI & CO

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
07 October 2026
Senior Account Manager

Amplio Invest

Mumbai

M.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article assistant

S.K.Bajpai & Co.

Noida

B.Com

View Details