Court :
Madras High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Madras High Court in M/s Mandarina Apartment Owners Welfare Association v. Commercial Tax Officer/State Tax Officer [Writ Petition No.15307 & 15330 of 2024 dated July 16, 2024] held that the show cause notice lacked reference to scrutiny under Section 61 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Instead, it cited data from GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B returns, highlighting discrepancies. Both the notice and the impugned order referred to a scrutiny under Section 61, fulfilling the conditions for issuing an ASMT-10 notice. The failure to issue the ASMT-10 rendered the scrutiny's conclusions invalid for adjudication. However, since the petitioner was given an opportunity to show cause, adjudication was not solely based on scrutiny under Section 61, and no prejudice was caused. The matter was remanded for reconsideration.
Citation :
Writ Petition No.15307 & 15330 of 2024 dated July 16, 2024]
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CMNITY HIRE
New Delhi
Others
View Details
Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co
New Delhi
CA
View Details
YOGESH KAPOOR AND ASSOCIATES
New Delhi
B.Com
View Details
SSGS and Associates
Chennai
CA Inter
View Details
CAclubindia
