In case of non appearance without application by appellant Rule 19 is applied


Last updated: 14 August 2012

Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Brief :
At the time of hearing, none has put in appearance on behalf of the assessee. Also, no adjournment application is on the record. Keeping in view these facts, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. Therefore, considering these facts and keeping in mind the provisions of Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules as were considered by the Tribunal in “CIT Vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd”, 38 ITD 320 (Del) and by the Hon’ble M.P.High Court in the case of “Late Tukoji Rao Holkar”, 223 ITR 480 (MP), we treat this appeal as un admitted.

Citation :
Express Earthmovers & Equipments Pvt. Ltd., 2A, Avenue Cassia, Westend Greens, Rajokari, New Delhi. PAN: AAACE9926C (Appellant) Vs. ACIT, Cent. Circle 22, New Delhi. (Respondent)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI

BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

AND

SHRI K.D. RANJAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

I.T.A.No. 402/Del/2012

Assessment Year: 2008-09

Express Earthmovers &

Equipments Pvt. Ltd.,

2A, Avenue Cassia,

Westend Greens, Rajokari,

New Delhi.

PAN: AAACE9926C

(Appellant)

Vs.

ACIT,

Cent. Circle 22,

New Delhi.

 (Respondent)

Appellant by: None

Respondent by: Shri Rajiv Ranka, Sr. DR

O R D E R

PER A.D. JAIN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:-

This is an appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2008-09 against the order of the CIT (A)-III, New Delhi, dated 18.11.2011.

2. At the time of hearing, none has put in appearance on behalf of the assessee. Also, no adjournment application is on the record. Keeping in view these facts, we are of the opinion that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. Therefore, considering these facts and keeping in mind the provisions of Rule 19(2) of the ITAT Rules as were considered by the Tribunal in “CIT Vs. Multiplan (India) Pvt. Ltd”, 38 ITD 320 (Del) and by the Hon’ble M.P.High Court in the case of “Late Tukoji Rao Holkar”, 223 ITR 480 (MP), we treat this appeal as un admitted.

3. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.

4. The order pronounced in the open court on 01.08.2012.

                                               Sd/-                                  Sd/-

                                     [K.D. RANJAN]               [A.D. JAIN]

                            ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 01 .08.2012.

Dk

Copy forwarded to: -

1. Appellant

2. Respondent

3. CIT

4. CIT(A)

5. DR, ITAT

Deputy Registrar,

ITAT, Delhi Benches

 

CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 1618

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
06 July 2026
Senior Accountant

Arvindkumar Maniar & Co.

Rajkot

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
21 July 2026
Chartered Accountant

Keshri & Associates

Thiruvananthapuram

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT, CA SemiQualified

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 July 2026
CA Articles

Kinjal H Shah & Co.

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
16 July 2026
CA Inter, CA Intermediate, CA IPCC, CA CPT , CA SemiQualifie

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 July 2026
Article Assistant and B.com pass

BANSAL YOGESH AND CO

Gautam Budh Nagar

B.Com

View Details