Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
This is an appeal filed by the revenue. It is directed against the order passed by the CIT (A) dated 3rd February, 2011 for Assessment Year 2006-07. The grounds of appeal read as under:-
On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT (A) has erred in holding that base year for calculating indexed cost of acquisition would be 1981-82.
On the facts and circumstances of the case, learned CIT (A) has erred in not appreciating that first year in which asset was held the assessee was the first year in which it was inherited by the assessee.
The appellant prays for leave to add, amend, modify or alter any grounds of appeal at the time or before the hearing of appeal.”
Citation :
Deputy Director of Income Tax,Circle 2(2),New Delhi.(Appellant)Vs.Ms Banita Sawhney,C/o Suresh Sethi & Co., CA’s,42, GF, World Trade Centre,New Delhi – 110 001.PAN : BHXPS6829N(Respondent)
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Judgement posted by
Shivani
Finance Professional
I am passionate about simplifying finance, taxation, investing, insurance, and career trends into practical insights. Through my articles, I help readers make informed financial decisions, understand industry developments, and stay updated on personal finance, CA, and business topics.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
