Hotel accommodation service used by employee is an eligible input service for availment of Credit

Last updated: 29 October 2022
Quick Summary
The CESTAT has ruled that hotel accommodation used by employees for business purposes, specifically for providing 'Erection, Commissioning, and Installation' services, qualifies as an eligible input service for claiming CENVAT credit. The tribunal found that such accommodation is essential for delivering the taxable output service. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the assessee is entitled to consequential benefits.

Court :
CESTAT, Delhi

Brief :
The Hon'ble CESTAT, Delhi in M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST-Dehradun [Final Order No. 50958 / 2022] held that the Hotel accommodation service received by the appellant is an eligible input service under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 ("CCR"). Further, the CESTAT allowed the appeal and held that the assessee is also entitled to consequential benefits.

Citation :
Final Order No. 50958 / 2022

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 1203
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  3. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  4. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  5. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  6. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  7. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  8. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  9. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  10. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member ajay khannaajay khannaPro Member Thanwar ChhatwaniThanwar ChhatwaniPro Member Anil GudleAnil GudlePro Member Sivanath VVSivanath VVPro Member chandradhass sathishchandradhass sathish
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category