Court :
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Brief :
In the return of income the aforesaid amount was claimed to be not taxable under the Act. The Assessing Officer called upon the assessee to explain how the aforesaid items were not taxable. In response to the query, the assessee submitted a written reply dated 18th December, 1998. Briefly stated, the assessee took up the plea that the aforesaid items did not represent any expenditure or loss or liability allowed in any of the earlier years as a deduction, that the amount of Rs.10,72,329/- represented small credit balances in the account of the customers and suppliers out of advance received from them for supplies to be made subsequently which they did not collect or which could not be fully adjusted against the supplies made to them, that the essential requisites for invoking Section 41(1) of the Act were absent, that Section 28(iv) was also not applicable and that in these circumstances the aggregate amount of Rs.17,39,263/- cannot be brought to tax.
Citation :
COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I ..Appellant Through Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate. VERSUS MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED …..Respondent Through Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Prakash Kumar,Advocate.
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Input Tax Credit, GST refunds and Recovery of refunds- Roadblocks and way outs
GST LIVE Certification Course - 43rd Weekdays Batch(With Govt Certificate)