Deduction u/s 54B cannot be denied if the correlation between investment and receipt of sale proceeds has been demonstrated

Last updated: 24 December 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has ruled that a deduction under Section 54B of the Income-Tax Act cannot be denied solely because the sale proceeds were not deposited into a specific capital account. The Tribunal found that the assessee had clearly demonstrated the correlation between their investment in agricultural land and the receipt of sale proceeds within the stipulated time frame. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the disallowance of the deduction was deleted.

Court :
ITAT Ahmedabad

Brief :
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-5), Vadodara [“CIT(A) in short] dated 25.02.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2012-13.

Citation :
ITA No. 657/Ahd/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Limitation for filing GST appeal runs from the date of actual communication of the order as declared by the dealer unless rebutted by the Revenue through cogent material
  2. Supreme Court: Cruise Operators Eligible for Section 44B Presumptive Taxation; Hospitality Services Do Not Change Nature of ‘Carriage’
  3. Karnataka High Court Quashes Externment Order Passed Without Adequate Opportunity of Hearing
  4. Supreme Court: No Service Tax on Indivisible Turnkey ATM Contracts Prior to 1 June 2007
  5. ITAT Quashes AY 2015-16 Reassessment as Section 148 Notice Issued After 1 April 2021 Was Invalid
  6. ITAT Condones 2,073-Day Delay and Deletes Addition for Cash Deposit Explained by Property Sale and Savings
  7. ITAT Deletes Addition for Alleged On-Money Payment Due to Lack of Evidence Against Buyer
  8. ITAT Holds Estate with Sole Executor Taxable at Individual Slab Rates, Not Maximum Marginal Rate
  9. ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty Where Section 80P Deduction Was Claimed Under Bona Fide Belief
  10. ITAT Quashes Reassessment Due to Approval from Incompetent Authority Under Section 151

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Ashish ChawlaAshish ChawlaPro Member vijai guptavijai guptaPro Member Ankit MehtaAnkit MehtaPro Member Prashant KotechaPrashant KotechaPro Member SANJAY GOSALIASANJAY GOSALIA
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category