Dasaratham Bitla , Bangalore vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income TAx Circle-5(3)(1), Bangalore

Last updated: 23 December 2020
Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case concerns an appeal filed by Dasaratham Bitla for the assessment year 2008-2009. The assessee opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the assessee's counsel requested an adjournment. The Departmental Representative advised that the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn, as the assessee is required to formally withdraw it after filing under the Act. The Tribunal typically grants liberty to seek recall of the order if the appeal is dismissed.

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directedagainst CIT(A)’s order dated 08.06.2017. The relevant assessment year is 2008-2009.

Citation :
ITA No.1894/Bang/2017

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 115
downloaded 228 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. No 10% pre-deposit required on any Penalty-only order from SCN issued prior to October 01, 2025
  2. Ratification is no substitute for recommendation - Notifications travelling beyond GST Council recommendations are ultra vires
  3. Disparity between seigniorage fee paid and supply value declared in GSTR-1 justifies invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  4. Interest on Delayed Payment of GST Arises by Operation of Law and Cannot be Waived by Courts
  5. Supreme Court to examine whether the six-month time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 74(2) of the CGST Act is mandatory or directory
  6. Advocates ought to be summoned only in rare and exceptional circumstances
  7. Unsigned Assessment Order in Form GST DRC-07 is Invalid as Absence of the Assessing Officer's Signature is an Incurable Jurisdictional Defect
  8. SC to examine whether an assessee can be relegated to the appellate remedy, when the challenge is to a binding Circular
  9. Mere Expiry of E-Way Bill Without Intent to Evade Tax Cannot Justify 200% Penalty
  10. No GST Levy on Assignment of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots as Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's SLPs

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member poojaambedepoojaambedePro Member CA. MOHIT SHARMACA. MOHIT SHARMAPro Member Amogh GokhaleAmogh GokhalePro Member sinu kuriansinu kurianPro Member vinalvinal
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Follow