Cost of improvement of agricultural land under the Income Tax Act, 1961

Last updated: 22 July 2021
Quick Summary
This case concerns the cost of improving agricultural land and its impact on calculating long-term capital gains tax. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reviewed an appeal where the assessee claimed a deduction for improvement costs on land sold. The Tribunal noted a previous ruling by a co-ordinate bench allowing 50% of such improvement costs for a co-owner in a similar situation.

Court :
ITAT Ahmedabad

Brief :
This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, arises from order of the CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad dated 04-03-2016, in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 

Citation :
ITA No. 1676 /Ahd/2016

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  2. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  3. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  4. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  5. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  6. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  7. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  8. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  9. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  10. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member dhavaldhavalPro Member Raj GuptaRaj GuptaPro Member Ankur RiswadkarAnkur RiswadkarPro Member Selvaraj KSelvaraj KPro Member Ashutosh PurohitAshutosh Purohit
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
18 September 2026
Accounts & Finance Specialist

ULTRA CHEMICAL WORKS

Thane

CA Final

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

MBA

View Details
Company
09 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Aviv Global Private Limited

Ahmedabad

CA

View Details
Company
06 October 2026
Assistant Manager - Audit and Compliance

Ravi K Jain & Co

Noida

Others

View Details
Company
22 September 2026
Account Assistant

Chirag P Shah & Co. Chartered Accountant

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
17 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

Dass Gupta & Associates

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
08 September 2026
Audit Executive

Thammana & Associates

Srikakulam

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 September 2026
Freelance Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details