Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India



Held that since the subsidiary co. did not have the authority to negotiate or enter into contracts on behalf of the foreign principal, it could not be held to be Permanent Establishment of the foreign co. in India and since, assessee did not have any

Posted in Income Tax |   37 Views



Held that no amount can be disallowed on account of estimated personal use of vehicles and telephone by directors and their family members in case of a company. Hence, disallowance of Rs. 1 lacs each from vehicle and telephone expenses was not justif

Posted in Income Tax |   35 Views


Rectification of Mistakes::

  CA.Saibaburao Nanduri    07 September 2007 at 11:57

Held that failure to consider vital facts brought on record and ommission to consider decisions of various courts will constitute a a mistake apparent from record. Hence, Tribunal can rectify the mistakes u/s 254(2).

Posted in Income Tax |   55 Views



Held that it is not mandatory under provisions of section 35(1)(iv) that plant and machinery purchased must be put to use. It is enough that the expenditure is incurred on purchase of plant and machinery to be used in research work. Hence, A.O. is no

Posted in Income Tax  1 comments |   48 Views


Wealth tax penalty u/s 18(1)(a) ::

  CA.Saibaburao Nanduri    07 September 2007 at 11:57

Held by Ho"ble Court that the application for extension of time submitted by the assessee and the reply to the show cause notice was not considered by the AO while levying the penalty for not furnishing the wealth-tax return with in due date as evide

Posted in Others |   37 Views



Held by the Hon'ble court that exemption u/s 5(1)(iv) has been provided to one house or part of the house belonging to the assessee.Cinema building and market cannot be held as a house.

Posted in Others |   39 Views



Held by the Hon"ble court that two contiguous buildings in the same compound constituted a house belonging to the assessee exclusively used by him for residential purposes hence the assessee was entitled to exemption in respect of both the buildings.

Posted in Others |   92 Views



Held that, let out portion not exempted, only part used for the business is exepmted.

Posted in Others |   36 Views


Valuation of immovable property::

  CA.Saibaburao Nanduri    07 September 2007 at 11:57

Held by the court that any Immovable property can not be valued at reversionary value for the purpose of capitalising the net annual letting value

Posted in Others |   46 Views



Held that in the absence of material on record justifying the delay in filing of returns, assessee is liable to pay penalty for the entire period.

Posted in Others |   49 Views



CCI Pro
Follow us