Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Liaility of TDS not advised by CA_Penalty cancelled
CA.Tarun Maheshwari 19 August 2008 at 01:48
the assessee had made certain payments for fabrication charges, but had not deducted tax at source. The Assessing Officer held that the assessee has failed to deduct tax at source u/s.194C. The contention of the assessee was that it was not advised b
Liability due to Exchange Fluctuation
CA.Tarun Maheshwari 11 August 2008 at 16:37
The assessee obtained orders from foreign buyers with advance payment to be adjusted against supplies to be made. The assessee had to supply in future more quantities than what was originally agreed due to rupee devaluation. The assessee treated th
vat on software development
SUBRAHMANYA SRINIVAS M.V. 31 July 2008 at 10:46
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 633 - Power of the court
Mr. PURNA P 30 July 2008 at 11:41
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 633 - Power of the court to give relief against prosecution - minor defaults by the company-ROC sought to prosecute the highest ranking officers of the company- Whether relief could be granted to the officers of the comp
Income from housing property or business income
CA. A. Kumar 26 July 2008 at 14:50
Justification of Interest levied u/s 234.
CA. A. Kumar 10 July 2008 at 17:57
Case Fact: Whether deletion of interest under section 234 is justified if there is no direction in the Assessment order to levy interest.
Trending Online Classes
-
LIVE Course on GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C (Technical | Practical | Concept - Based)
Sachin Jain03 November 2025
CAclubindia
