Ahemdabad CESTAT on rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Last updated: 18 September 2008

Court :
CESTAT

Brief :
Rule 3 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - CENVAT credit - Respondents were utilizing services of Customs House Agent (CHA) and surveyors at time of export of goods by treating same as input service - Respondents continued to remain owners of goods till same were exported as such place of removal in case of exported goods was port area - Whether since ownership of goods remained with respondents till port area, it could be safely concluded that all services availed by them till port area were required to be considered as input service inasmuch as same were clearly related to business activities - Held, yes - Whether, therefore, credit of duty paid on such services was admissible to respondents - Held, yes

Citation :
Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) v. Rolex Rings (P.) Ltd. [Appeal No. E/375 & 454 of 2007]

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  2. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  3. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  4. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  5. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  6. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  7. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  8. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  9. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  10. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member venkanna settyvenkanna settyPro Member THUSHAR MURALI KRISHNATHUSHAR MURALI KRISHNAPro Member ANUPAMA L KANTANUPAMA L KANTPro Member Mohinder GoelMohinder GoelPro Member SUBASH CHANDRA BOSESUBASH CHANDRA BOSE
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category