Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This intra-Court appeal impugns the judgment dated 18th January, 2011 allowing W.P.(C) No. 5093/1998 preferred by the respondents no.1 to 3 herein and quashing the “Regulations of Membership” of the appellant to the extent the same were held to be in

The facts of this case very briefly are that Bharat Rasayan Limited (for short ‘the assessee’) filed a return of income tax claiming a deduction of Rs.72,76,405/- under Section 80HHC of the Act. In the assessment order, the Assessing Officer held tha

On the observation of the detailed case we can find the following fact from the judgment..... i) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) erred in deleting the additions made on account of provision gratuity u/s

On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating that clause(b) of the Explanation(1) of Sec. 11 5JB provides that for calculating book profit the profit as shown in the profit and loss account has to be

On the observation the following facts are found:- i) On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in l aw the learned CIT(A) erred in sustaining the addition to total income of Rs.5,00,000/- received as gift on 23rd August, 2004 which

The assessee is under the Ministry of Shipping, Govt. of India. Assessee’s business is in ship building, ship repairing and general engineering. The ld. A.O. made an addition of Rs. 2 crores, which was stated as received from Government for upkeep of

The facts in brief are that the assessee company was engaged in the business of undertaking contracts for providing various liaison activities in telecommunication strategy had entered into contract dated 5.1.2005 with M/s. ZTE Corporation, a Chinese

The appeal was fixed for hearing today i.e. on 1st February, 2012. No one is present on behalf of assessee. Nor there is any application for adjournment. In view of above, it appears that assessee is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. Hence t

When the appeal was called for hearing, a letter dated 27.1.2012 signed by the assessee was placed before us, wherein the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal. It is mentioned in the letter received on 27.1.2012 as under: “I request w

This Intra-Court Appeal impugns the judgment dated 31st August, 2007 of the learned Single Judge allowing WP(C) No. 469/2005 preferred by the respondent no.1 and directing the appellant to restore the LPG distributorship to the respondent no.1 and to