Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This judgement is quite loudable judgement in favour of the taxpayers having inverted duty structure. In regard to the applicability, since there is no contrary judgment in this issue till date, so, this judgement has pan India applicability.

When a statement recorded under Section 70 under GST CGST Act, 2017 is Relevant and Admissible? -Analysis of Section 136 of CGST Act, 2017

(i) Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia), 40A(3) etc are intended to enforce due compliance of the requirement of other provisions of the Act and to ensure proper collection of tax as also transparency in dealings. The interest of a bonafide assessee who had m

In the case of Shailendra Swarup vs. the Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate, the Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan, and Justice R. Subhash Reddy delivered a judgment stating that the proceedings complying with section 68 o

As per the Gujarat AAR Decision in case of Shree Sawai Manoharlal Rathi it has been ruled that Interest on PPF and SB and on Personal Loans and Advanced to family/friends would be considered while calculating the "Aggregate Turnover".

The Supreme Court has observed that while applying the multiplier method in computing Motor Accident Compensation, future prospects on advancement in life and career are also to be taken into consideration.

Computation of total Income with disallowance of payment u/s 40 (a)(ia)

From the conjoint reading of the provisions of Act and Rules, it appears that by prescribing the formula in Sub-rule 5 of Rule 89 of the CGST Rules,2017 to exclude refund of tax paid on "input service" as part of the refund of the unutilized input ta

High Court decided to grant the bail to the petitioner who is allegedly guilty of creating bogus firms/companies solely for the purpose of fraudulently creating and issuing GST invoices without any sale/purchase and actual movement of goods.

The issue under consideration is whether the addition on account of notional rent in respect of vacant property is justified in law?