Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India



UNDER SECTION 15-I OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES) RULES, 1995

Posted in LAW |   162 Views



UNDER SECTION 15 -I OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES) RULES, 1995

Posted in LAW |   227 Views



UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES), 1995.

Posted in LAW |   528 Views



UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER) RULES, 1995.

Posted in LAW |   199 Views



UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES) RULES, 1995.

Posted in LAW |   125 Views



UNDER SECTION 23‐I OF SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) ACT, 1956 READ WITH RULE 5 OF SECURITIES CONTRACTS (REGULATION) (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIESBY ADJUDICATION OFFICER) RULES, 2005In respect ofPolar Ph

Posted in LAW |   109 Views


M/s. Lucky Exports, New Delhi Vs. DCIT, New Delhi

  Guest    29 September 2020 at 13:26

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.11.2013 of the CIT(A)-28, New Delhi relating to assessment year 2008-09.

Posted in Income Tax |   94 Views


Sh. Romi Lal Nanda, Delhi Vs. ITO, New Delhi

  Guest    29 September 2020 at 13:26

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28th January 2016 of the CIT(A)-12, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2008-09.

Posted in Income Tax |   106 Views



With this appeal, the assessee has challenged the correctness of the assessment order dated 26.12.2016 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C of the [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short]

Posted in Income Tax |   101 Views


Sanjeev Garg, Panipat Vs. ITO WARD-4, Panipat

  Guest    29 September 2020 at 13:26

This appeal is filed by Mr. Sanjeev Garg, assessee-appellant against the order of the ld CIT(Appeals), Karnal, dated 24.04.2019 for Assessment Year 2014-15 wherein penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') by Inco

Posted in Income Tax |   125 Views



CCI Pro

Follow us