Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

F. No. 7/5/2020-DGTR.—Having regard to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 as amended (hereinafter referred as the ―Act‖) and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Inju

The Hon’ble Appellate Authority, GST, Andhra Pradesh, in Re:Vaachi International Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. 4990 of 2020dated February 10, 2020] held that the SEZ unit/developers shall not claim any refund against input tax credit ("ITC") involved in suppl

“The appellant is a private limited company engaged in carrying specialist service of dry cleaning, providing such services to hotels, airline companies and the like. The appellant had been delaying payment of Central Goods and Services tax as also t

Through the instant petition challenge has been laid to Exts.P4, P4 (a), P4(b) & P4 (c) Assessment orders and recovery notices Exts.P8, P8(b) & P8(c) with other consequential prayers. In support of the aforementioned prayer, the writ petition is base

1. The appellant filed an application under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) 0/o the Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 3(4), Room No. 89, Aayakar Bhawan, Paota C Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Th

The present appeal has been preferred by Defendant No. 4, against the concurrent findings of three Courts arising out of a suit for permanent injunction.

1. This hearing has been held by video conferencing. 2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.04.2020 passed by the learned Central Information Commission (CIC) on Second Appeal No:-CIC/GAILD/A/2018/631935-BJ.

Whether an employee who retired on 31st of a month is entitled to the increment which would have fallen due on 1st of the next month is the question involved in the Civil Writ Petition No. 2503 of 2016.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 6/4/2017 passed by CIT(A)- 43, for Assessment Year 2012-13.

This petition raises an interesting question of the effect of the lockdown declared by the Central Government due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the period of the Provisional Attachment Orders passed under Section 5(1) of the Prevention