Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Aurangabad, dated 27-07-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(A)-8, Pune on 07-05-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2009-10.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-7, Pune, dated 18-01-2018 in relation to the assessment year 2013-14.

This appeal by the assessee emanates from the order passed by the CIT(TDS), Pune on 25-09-2019 in relation to the assessment year 2019-20.

This appeal filed by the Assessee against the Order of Ld. CIT(A)-24, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 dated25.7.2016 wherein, the addition of Rs. 2,44,00,000/- made by the AO with respect to the closing stock was upheld. Assessee by Sh. Shashwa

The assessee has filed an appeal against theorder of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -58, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the Notice issued u/sec 274 r.

Since common question of facts and law is involved in allthe aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

Since common question of facts and law is involved in all the aforesaid cross appeals, the same are taken up together for disposal by way of composite order to avoid repetition of discussion.

The present appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the respective orders passed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax-2, Mumbai [Pr.CIT] under Sec. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [for short ‘Act’], dated 26.03.2019 AND the order passed b