Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This Civil Appeal raises an important question of law concerning arbitration law in India and special enactments enacted by States concerning public works contract.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year 2003-04 contests the order of learned first appellate authority passed on 31/12/2010 on certain grounds of appeal. The assessment was framed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) 13/03/2006.

This appeal in ITA No.753/Mum/2014 for A.Y.2008-09 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-38, in appeal No.CIT(A)-38/IT-170/2011-12 dated 29/11/2013 (ld. CIT(A) in short) in the matter of imposition of penalty u/s.271

This appeal in ITA No.5654/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-29, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-29/IT-196/ITO-18(2)(4)/15-16 dated 28/04/2015 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assess

These appeals in ITA No.7105/Mum/2017, 7106/Mum/2017, 7107/Mum/2017 & 7108/Mum/2017 for A.Y.2009-10, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09 arise out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-50, Mumbai in appeal Nos.CIT(A)-50/IT-73/2016-17-AY

These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought

At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared for assessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed onrecord, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the dispute under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme),

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in S.S. Industries v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 8841 of 2020 with R/Special Civil Application No. 8163 of 2020 decided on December 24, 2020] upheld the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax I

These two appeals pertain to the same assessee, involve a common issue regarding taxation of ESOP benefit and were heard together. All the relevant material facts are admittedly the same, except for a variation in the quantum of ESOP benefits brought

At the time of hearing of captioned appeal, none appeared forassessee. However, vide assessee’s counsel letter as placed on record, it transpires that the assessee is opting to settle the disputeunder Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme (VVS Scheme),