The assessee has filed these four appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 52, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
These are appeals by the assessee, against the common orderdated 31st July 2018, passed by the learned CIT(A) for the concerned assessment years as above.
This appeal by the assessee wherein the assessee is aggrieved that the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short) dated01.11.2018 has erred in sustaining 25% disallowance on account of bogus purchase for the assessm
These are appeals by the revenue wherein the revenue is aggrieved thatlearned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] hasreduced the addition by sustaining only 12.5% of the disallowance for bogus purchases.
This is an appeal by the Revenue wherein the Revenue is aggrieved that thelearned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-45, Mumbai (‘ld.CIT(A) for short)dated 21.01.2019 has reduced the addition for bogus purchase of Rs.3,12,24,345/- done @ 100% by th
The assessee has filed these two appeals againstthe separate orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) - 4, Mumbai, passed u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The assessee has filed the appeal against theorder of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -48, Mumbai, passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
This appeal by the assessee directed against order of learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 28.2.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2009-10.
These are appeals by the different assessee’s against the respective order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), pertaining to Assessment Year as mentioned above.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against order of learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [in short learned CIT(A)] dated 8.11.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2013-14.
CAclubindia
