Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Mr.J.Kumaran, learned Additional Government Pleader (Puducherry) accepts notice for the respondent and is armed with instructions to proceed with the matter. Hence, by consent of both sides, these Writ Petitions are disposed finally even at the stage

Orissa   Manganese   &   Minerals   Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Corporate Debtor” or “OMML”) was engaged in the business of mining iron ore, graphite, manganese   ore   and   agglomerating   iron   fines   into   pellets through   its   faci

In 2009, Corporate Power Ltd. [“the corporate debtor”] set up a thermal power project in Jharkhand, and for so doing, availed of loan facilities from various lenders, including the State Bank of India [“SBI”]. The account of the corporate debtor was

Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. 5464 of 2016 pertains to dishonour of two cheques on 27.01.2005 for an amount of Rs.1,70,000/-. The dispute has remained pending for the past 16 years. Concerned with the large number of cases filed under Section

The Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/S. Chaizup Beverages LLP v. the Assistant Commissioner & Ors. [W.P. Nos. 10969, 10972 and 10978 of 2020 and WMP. Nos. 13335, 13339 and 13343 of 2020, dated March 26, 2021] set aside orders of Appellate Authority rej

The Petitioner, Axis Ispat Private Limited, has filed the present petition seeking quashing of the 37 show cause notices, dated 28th January, 2021, issued against the Petitioner, by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Union of India, under various sec

Due to non-filing of annual returns and balance sheets in one of the companies, the Petitioner was disqualified as a director in 2017 with effect from 1st November, 2017 to 31st October, 2022 under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. His DI

This appeal raises significant issues of public importance, engaging as it does, the interface between citizens and their businesses with the fiscal administration. Legislation enacted for the levy of goods and services tax confers a power on the tax

The present appeal raises an interesting question – as to whether two companies incorporated in India can choose a forum for arbitration outside India – and whether an award made at such forum outside India, to which the Convention on the Recognition

The petitioner had registered himself as a dealer under TNVAT Act, 2006. Following the implementation of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the petitioner migrated into GST regime and got registered under the new Act.