Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The common thread in this present batch of petitions is that they pertain to transition of CENVAT credit from the erstwhile indirect tax regime to the present Goods and Services Tax (‘GST’) system by virtue of a right specifically conferred on the ta

The present petition was heard on 21st December, 2020 along with other batch matters relating to difficulties faced by taxpayers in filing form GST TRAN-1 (hereinafter “TRAN-1 Form”). However, considering that the issue involved in the present petiti

The prayer made in the captioned application is to grant exemption from filing requisite court-fee and sworn/notarised/affirmed affidavit. The captioned application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to place on record the duly sworn/n

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to forthwith grant and sanction interest on the refund amount after expiry of three months from the respective dates of applicatio

Heard Mr. Vikram Nankani, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajshekhar Govilkar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Subject matter and reliefs sought for in all the writ petitions being identical, those were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.

This is a case, where the obstructionist (who according to the decree holder is a sub-lessee/dealer of the original defendant) is obstructing the execution of the decree, for eviction, although the original lessee is willing to surrender possession,

The challenge in this petition is to the judgment and order dated 12th April 2019 in Revision Application No.NIL/2011 passed by Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Nashik, whereby the revision application preferred by the petitioner a

The Hon'ble CESTAT, New Delhi in the case of M/s National Steel & Agro Industries Limited v. Principal commissioner [Final Order Nos. 51518-51519/2021 decided on May 25, 2021] quashed the demand under Rule 6(3)(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 ('t

This judgment will dispose of common questions of law, which arise in various proceedings preferred under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, as well as transferred cases under Article 139A; those causes were transferred to the file of this cour