Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

 These appeals are directed against the separate orders dated 15.6.2018 of the CIT(Appeals)-12, Bengaluru for the assessment years 2013-14 & 2014-15.

 This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Assessing Officer dated 28.11.2017 passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act].

 This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.9.2018 of the CIT (Exemptions) [CIT(E), Bangalore rejecting registration u/s. 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act].

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 12.03.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2013-2014.

The assessee has filed these appeals relating to AY 2010-11 and 2012-13. The appeal filed for AY 2010-11 is directed against the order dated 30-08-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)_10, Bengaluru. The appeal filed for AY 2012-13 is directed against the assessm

These appeals by the assessee are against the separate orders, all dated 31.12.2019 of the CIT(Appeals)-11, Bengaluru for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2011-12. These appeals were heard together and disposed of by this common order for the sake of

This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2011-12, arises from order of the CIT(A)-11, Ahmedabad dated 04-03-2016, in proceedings under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 

This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2015-16, arises from order of the CIT(A), Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad dated 08-10-2018, in proceedings under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”.

The Hon'ble Patna High Court in Pankaj Sharma vs. UOI &Ors. [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7431 dated June 01, 2021] set aside the order dismissing the appeal of the assessee passed by the Revenue Department, on the ground that the same is cryptic

In T.M. Hotels Private Limited v. the Additional Commissioner of Central Excise [W.P. No. 14099 of 2014 and MP No. 1 of 2014 decided on July 6, 2021] T.M. Hotels Private Limited ('the Petitioner') prayed for quashing Order in Original No. 11/2014 (ST