Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur ("the ITAT") in the case of Mr. Nikhil Garg v. Income Tax Officer (ITA No. 180/JP/2018) dated February 14, 2022 held that in no case the entire sales amount can be treated as income and only the profit embedd

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench ("the ITAT") in the case of Abbasbhai A. Upletawala v. Income Tax Officer Ward 16(1)(1) [ITA No. 5332/Mum/2015 dated October 21, 2022] asked the government to bring out a mechanism to ensure tax recover

The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ("the CESTAT") in the cases of M/s. Surya Jyoti Global Logistics, Custom Broker Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Custom Appeal No. 50789 of 2021), vide [Final order No. 51144-51146/2022] da

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court ("the High Court") in the case of M/s. Shree Govind Alloys Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Gujarat (R/Special Civil Application No. 23835 of 2022)dated December 01, 2022, held that mere expiry of the e-way bill during transit of

The Maharashtra Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR)- has ruled that the GST is not applicable on charges collected under an unparalleled health scheme.

The Supreme Court of India ("the Supreme Court") in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax v. Merino Panel Product Ltd [Civil Appeal No. 6891 OF 2018 dated December 5, 2022] held that the Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX ("Circular") dat

The Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh ("the High Court") in the case of Deepak Kumar v. State of Punjab [CRM-M-38352-2014 dated November 29, 2022] held that in case of tax evasion, First Information Report ("FIR") cannot be regis

On the material before us and the material considered by the High Court, we are satisfied that the imposition of costs by the High Court was justified. We find no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment and order.

The Plaintiff manufactures truck tyre Endurance LD 10.00 R20, with a peculiar tread patter over which it had claimed proprietary rights.

These appeals have been preferred against the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana where the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act) on