Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The applicant recovers nominal amount from the employees for canteen facility - The applicant discharge GST @5% on the taxable value which is sum total of the cost of the canteen service provider plus 10% notional mark up.

The Kerala High Court- in this case interpreted the meaning of "Month" for the purpose of ascertaining the limitation period of Six Months as stipulated under Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the provisions of section 271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 lays down conditions for imposition of penalty for repayments of loans and deposits in cash, where the amount exceeds Rs. 20,000 in violati

THE HON'BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT HELD THAT –when an Insurance Company has not accepted the liability under the Insurance Policy and has repudiated the claim as "No Claim", then such denial of claim would not itself amount to an arbitrable dispute. The I

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the matter of M/s. Ganpati Battery Traders v. State of U.P. [Writ Tax No. 1138 of 2021 dated December 6, 2022] has held that mere selling of batteries by piece instead by weight does not make the seller liable to b

The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s Goel Medico [Advance Ruling No. STC/AAR/09/2021 dated December 17, 2021]has ruled that installation services of parts and equipment for supply of oxygen and other gases used in hospital, homes and connection

The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s. Savex Technologies Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. STC/AAR/06/2022 dated August 17, 2022] has held that, Interactive Flat Panel Screens used only for data processing purposes will attract Goods and Service Tax ("GST")

The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s Parsakente Collieries Limited [Advance Ruling No. STC/AAR/08/2021 dated December 17, 2021] has ruled that nil rate of Compensation Cess is applicable on supply of coal rejects by the coal washery, as long as

PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION, RETURN, ETC. SECTION 15A

THE APEX COURT HELD THAT-Authorization for search includes authorization of seizure as well.