Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M/S Hero Motocorp ltd. v. Union of India & ors. [Civil Appeal No. 7405 of 2022] held that the assessee established its units in North Eastern and the Himalayan States based on the Office Memorandum of 2003 and it

The Hon'ble CESTAT, Delhi in M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise & CGST-Dehradun [Final Order No. 50958 / 2022] held that the Hotel accommodation service received by the appellant is an eligible input service under Rule

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in Asia (Chennai) Engineering v. Assistant Commissioner (ST) (FAC) [W.P. (MD).Nos.13851 and 13870 of 2022 dated August 22, 2022] held that the filing of a reply to the show-cause notice in form GST-DRC-06 is not mandator

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in M/s. New Noble Educational Society,v. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 1 [Civil appeal no. 3795 of 2014 dated October 19, 2022] has held that for tax exemption, the charitable institution, society or trust should ‘sol

In deciding cases pertaining to insider trading, the actual gain or loss is immaterial, but the motive for making a gain is essential.

The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process("CIRP") can be initiated against the corporate debtor without proceeding against the principal borrower.

In case of renewal without break in the period, the Mediclaim insurance policy will be renewed without excluding any disease already covered under the existing policy which may have been contracted during the period of the expiring policy. Renewal of

Arbitration Agreement is with a Proprietorship concern "Yasikan Enterprise" and arbitration invoked by "Yasikan Enterprise Pvt Ltd" a company of the proprietor is not legal and tenable.

Borrower has appealed Order under SARFASEI ACT before DRAT and has deposited 50% of the contended sum. The appeal was further withdrawn by the borrower and appealed for refund of deposit amount. The Bank contended it cannot be refunded.

The gratuity of an employee whose services are being considered to be terminated on the accountability of an act of wilful omission/negligence causing any damage or loss to, or destruction of, property belonging to the employer shall be forfeited to