Judgements by Bimal Jain

The AAR, Gujarat in Shree Avani Pharma[Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/2023/32 dated November 03, 2023]ruled that, service of job work provided by the Applicant would fall within the purview of Sr. No. 26(id) of the Notification No. 11/2017-CE (Rate) d

The AAR, West Bengal, in the case of In Re:Tamal Kundu [WBAAR 18 of 2023 dated September 13, 2023], held that as per Notification No. 07/2022-Central Tax (Rate) dated July 13, 2022, ("the Notification") and Press Release dated July 18, 2022("the Pres

The Hon'ble Telangana High Court in the case of M/s. A.S.E. India v. Union of India[Writ Petition No. 4756 of 2023 dated November 6, 2023]the Impugned Notice, being in contravention of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 ("the

The Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of BIJU V.T v. The Senior Enforcement Officer, Ernakulam and Ors. [WP (C) No. 37521 of 2023 dated November 16, 2023] directed the Revenue Department to release the confiscated vehicle as per its own discretio

The Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s. Raymond Ltd. v. Union of India [WP No. 26693 of 2022 dated November 20, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that, the Reasonable time period for filing reply to the SCN is to be considere

The AAAR, Gujarat in the case of M/s. The Varachha Co-Op. Bank Ltd. [Ruling No. 37/2021 dated  October 04, 2023] observed that items like the Central Air Conditioning Plant, Lift, Electrical Fittings, and Fire Safety Extinguishers were categorized as

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Sunil Traders v. State of UP and Others [Writ Tax No. 678 of 2023 dated November 16, 2023] allowed the writ petition and held that, the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the judgment in M/s.

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court heard the case of SRSS Agro Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India [R/Special Civil Application No. 19720 of 2023] on November 10, 2023.

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Association of Technical Textiles Manufacturers and Processors &Anr. V. Union of India & ors. [W.P.(C) 5933/2019 dated November 16, 2023] held that, the respondents could not draw attention to any provision

The CESTAT, Allahabad in the case of M/s. Mahesh & Co. Pte Ltd. Singapore v. Commissioner of Customs Noida[Customs Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022 dated November 9, 2023], imposed a penalty of Rs.2,00,000/- for causing delay in implementation of