Judgements by Bimal Jain

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s Abhishek Appliance (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner CGST [Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8920 of 2024 dated July 03, 2024] ruled that an Assessee should be given an opportunity to respond the allegations

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Shree Om Steels v. Additional Commissioner and Ors. [Writ Tax No. 1007 of 2022 dated July 19, 2024], allowed the writ petition and held that confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the Central Goo

The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Kolvekar Logistics v. Joint Commissioner of Commercial taxes (Appeals), Hubbali [Writ Petition No.100347 of 2022 dated April 22, 2024], quashed the orders and held that in the light of the Rule 138-A of

The Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh, in case of M/s Payline Technology Private Limited, In Re [Ruling No. UP ADRG 43 of 2024 dated February 20, 2024] ruled that Supply of Vouchers by the Applicant is taxable as supply of goods and the tim

The AAR, Maharashtra in the case of In Re: AES Engineering Solar (P.) Ltd. [GST/ARA/04 of 2023-24/2024-25-57 dated July 31, 2024], ruled that the supply of electrical energy by the AES Engineering was exempt from levy of GST as per Entry No. 104 of N

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case ofNanjappan Senthilkumar v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Erode [Writ Petition No. 11439 of 2024 dated June 3, 2024] held that if the Order passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act,

The Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal in the case of Prinsep Association of Apartment Owners, In re [Order No. 22/WBAAR/2023-24 dated November 29, 2023] ruled that the exemption is not available when the maintenance charges exceed Rs. 7,500/-

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench in the case of M/s. Eveready Industries India Limited v. State of UP [Writ Tax No. 114 of 2024 dated May 31, 2024] allowed the writ petition and held that it is mandatory to grant opportunity of a perso

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal [Civil Appeal No 8629 of 2024 dated October 03, 2024] set aside the judgments of the various High Courts which held that the reassessment notices issued under Section 148 of

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s Veeram Natural Products v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Madurai [Writ Petition (MD) Nos. 9446 to 9452 of 2024 dated July 03, 2024] held that the aluminium foil container is classifiable under