Judgements by Poojitha Raam Vinay

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order dated 02.01.2018 of the Ld. CIT(A)-7, New Delhi, relevant to the A.Y. 2013-2014.

Both the above captioned appeals by the assessee are preferred against the order of the CIT(A) - Aligarh, dated 13.01.2016 pertaining to A.Ys 2011-12 and 2012-13.

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A) – 2, New Delhi, dated 19.02.2018 pertaining to A.Y 2010-11.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 7th June, 2019 of the CIT(A)-15, New Delhi, relating to assessment year 2016-17.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex parte order dated 28th August, 2019 of the CIT(A), Ghaziabad, relating to assessment year 2015-16.

This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 25-04-2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Pune [„CIT(A)‟] for assessment year 2014-15.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-8, New Delhi [ The ld CIT (A)] dated 15.01.2020 wherein, the appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed u/s 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [ The Act] by the Joint

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dt. 01/06/2019 of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Ludhiana.

The assessee to explain why the arm’s length price (ALP) of the AMP expenditure should not be determined by applying the Bright Line Test (BLT) method.

This appeal in ITA No.4612/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-1/143/DCIT(CPC)/2018-19 dated 16/05/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment p