Judgements by Poojitha Raam Vinay

The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenuevagainst the order dated 18.12.2017 of the Commissioner ofvIncome Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2012-13.

This appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 09-10-2018 passed by the High Court at Calcutta in ITA No.116 of 2018.setting aside (i) the order dated 25.02.2016 passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) (“CIT” for short) canceling regist

The assessee is in second round of appeal before us since the matter was earlier remanded back by co-ordinate bench of Tribunal (ITA No.61/Mum/2011 order dated 07/02/2014)

The present appeal has been preferred by the assesseevagainst the order dated 26.09.2019 of the Commissioner ofvIncome Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2015-16.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-3, Mumbai [in short 'the CIT(A)�] dated 30/09/2019 for the assessment year 2007-08.

The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3 passed u/s 271(1)(c) and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

This is assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2005-06 against the order of CIT(Appeals)-4, Hyderabad dated 18.02.2016. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal.

Captioned appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 23.10.2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)�14, Mumbai for the assessment year 2016-17

This appeal is filed by Revenue while the Cross Objection is filed by the assessee, against the order of CIT(A)-1, Hyderabad dated 26.10.2017 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.

This is assessee�s appeal filed against the order of CIT(A)-7, Hyderabad dated 26.11.2018 relating to A.Y. 2014-15.