Corporate Law Judgements

The Kerala High Court- in this case interpreted the meaning of "Month" for the purpose of ascertaining the limitation period of Six Months as stipulated under Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019.

THE HON'BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT HELD THAT –when an Insurance Company has not accepted the liability under the Insurance Policy and has repudiated the claim as "No Claim", then such denial of claim would not itself amount to an arbitrable dispute. The I

PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO FURNISH INFORMATION, RETURN, ETC. SECTION 15A

THE APEX COURT HELD THAT-Authorization for search includes authorization of seizure as well.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in AMD Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow and Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 108 of 2023dated January 9, 2023] upheld the order passed by the Hon'ble Allahabad High Court holding that due to advancement in tech

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in M/s Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax [Sales/Trade Tax Revision No. 360 and 361 of 2022 dated December 22, 2022] set aside the order passed by the Commercial Tax Trib

The Apex Court Held that – Trade Union is an 'operational creditor' when representing the interests of the workmen.

A bank acting as per the remedies available to it under the SARFAESI Act for recovery cannot be termed as a dominant entity when it acts in accordance with provision thereof as it is acting in recovery of its funds/money in order to mitigate losses i

The Adjudicating Authority cannot direct a forensic audit and engage in a long-drawn pre-admission exercise which will have the effect of defeating the object of the �I&B Code,2016.

In the said judgment, SC reiterated the observations of its earlier judgement that a MOFS prepared after family arrangement was already made for the purpose of recording the information or for the information of the court, is not required to be regis