GST Judgements

The Hon’ble AAR Madhya Pradesh in M/s. Khatwani Sales and Services LLP [Order No. 13/2020 dated July 23, 2020] held that since the demo vehicles do not comply to any of the conditions prescribed in Clause (A), (B) and (C) of Section 17(5)(a) of the C

The Hon’ble AAR Haryana in M/s. JSL India Private Limited [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/51 decided on April 24, 2019] held that supply of un-assembled rail coach from one unit to another unit where these goods would be assembled together (in

The Hon'ble AAR, Haryana in the matter of M/S. VDM Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/02, decided on June 21, 2020] held that, temporary structure (i.e., hall or pandal or shamiana or any other place) built up with iron/stee

The Hon'ble AAR Haryana in M/s. Informage Reality Private Limited [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/15 dated October 5, 2018] has held that booking/ selling of plots to be done by the Applicant and the Landowners during the development of the to

The Hon'ble AAR Haryana in M/s. Musashi Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/18 dated February 4, 2020] has held that Input Tax Credit ('ITC') is not available with respect to canteen services provided by the employer to their

The Hon'ble AAAR Karnataka, in the matter of M/s. Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. KAR/AAAR/01/2020-21, dated January 11, 2021] held thatthe property tax paid to the Municipal Authority cannot be deducted from the monthly rental income for arrivi

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Tejas Pravin Dugad v. Union of India [Order No. Criminal Writ Petition No.1715 to 1718 of 2020, decided on January 15, 2021] dismissed the writ petition filed by Directors of M/s. Ganraj Ispat Private Limited ("Compan

The Hon'ble AAR, Haryana, in the matter of M/S. Wilhelm Fricke SE [Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2019-20/24, decided onJune 25, 2020] held that, the Germany based head office and Indian Liaison Office ("LO") cannot be treated as separate persons as n

The Hon'ble A AAR, Maharashtra in M/s. Sanofi India Ltd. (Order No. MAH/AAAR/SS-RJ/10/2019-20 dated October 22, 2019) has held that as per Section 101(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("CGST Act") no advance ruling can be issued w.r

The Hon' ble AAR Gujarat in the matter of M/s. Sagar Powertex Private Limited [Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/98/2020, dated October 14, 2020] held that, ‘Central Goods and Services Tax (" CGST ) +State Goods and Services Tax ("SGST")' would be applic