Income Tax Judgements

This is an appeal by the Revenue against the final order dated 11.11.2016 of CIT, Hubli, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. The grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue reads as follows:

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28.12.2016 passed by the A.O. for assessment year 2013-14 u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144 C of the Act in pursuance to the directions given by Ld. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 25.03.2019 of CIT(A)-2, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2013-14.

This appeal by the Assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–10, Bangalore, dated 8.3.2019 in relation to assessment year 2013-14.

This appeal by the Assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–7, Bangalore, dated 29.11.2019 in relation to assessment year 2016-17.

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 4.2.2020 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-1 Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the A.O

These are two appeals filed by M/s. Sardar Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, for Assessment Years 1997-98 and 1998-99 against the combined order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)–31, New Delhi, dated 31.07.2017 wherein the appeals filed

This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 23/08/2017 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-17, New Delhi [in short ‘the Ld. CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2014-15 raising following grounds:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against order dated 30/08/2018 passed by the Learned CIT(Appeals)-21, New Delhi [in short ‘the Learned CIT(A)’] for assessment year 2010-11 raising following grounds:

Aggrieved by the order dated 28/9/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), New Delhi (“Ld. CIT(E)”) in the case of the Delhi Welfare And Recreational Club Fund, Delhi (“the appellant”) rejecting the application for grant of registr