Income Tax Judgements

Learned counsel for the respondents prayed for time to file reply but did not dispute the aforesaid contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner that similar petitions have been entertained by other High Courts and interim protection has been gr

In State vs. Yogesh Kumar Goyal [Bail Application No. 1676/21 dated August 31, 2021], Yogesh Kumar Goyal ("the Applicant") has filed the current bail application - against FIR No. DZU/INV/GST/A894/2021, made against him under Section 132 (1) (b) & (c

Leaned counsel relies on the judgment passed by the High Court of Delhi and this Court in writ petition No.6047/2021 M/s Devgiri Exports Vs. The Income Tax Officer as also the judgment passed by Supreme Court in Whirlpool Corporation Vs. Registrar of

Both these appeals filed by the assessee are directed against CIT(A) - 1 , Hyderabad’s separate orders dated 19/05/2017 for AY 2012-13 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) and 271(1)(c) of the Income- Tax Act.

All these appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against separate orders of CIT(A) for the AYs mentioned at Cause title involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income- Tax Act, 1961.

This is assessee�s appeal for the A.Y 2009-10 against the order of the CIT (A)-1, Hyderabad, dated 24.11.2017.

This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad dated 28.09.2018 pertaining to A.Y. 2014-15.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against CIT(A) – 1, Hyderabad’s order dated 25/03/2019 for AY 2012-13 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

This is assessee�s appeal for the A.Y 2015-16 against the order of the CIT (A)-3, Hyderabad, dated 7.2.2019 confirming the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-3, Hyderabad dated 04.09.2019 pertaining to A.Y. 2016-17.