Income Tax Judgements

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue against order dated31.05.2016 passed by CIT(A)-23, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 and 2013-14.

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue against order dated 31.05.2016 passed by CIT(A)-23, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 and order dated 30.05.2017 passed by CIT(A)-24, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2013-14.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 26.09.2017 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-37, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to ‘CIT(A)’) for the Assessment Year 2013-14.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.12.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.

This appeal by the assessee is preferred against order dated 29.06.2021 framed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(13) r.w.s 144B of the Incometax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'The Act'] pertaining to A.Y. 2016-17.

These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against two orders of the CIT(A), both dated 30.10.2019. The relevant assessment years are 2010-2011 and 2011-2012.

In Ashok Kumar Agarwal v. Union of India [WRIT TAX No. - 524 of 2021 dated September 30, 2021], Ashok Kumar Agarwal ("the Petitioner") had filed a Petition to challenge the initiation of re-assessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax A

In P.H. Chandrashekar v. ITO Ward-1(2) [C.O. No.106/Bang/2017] along with ITO Ward-1(2) Mysore v. P.H. Chandrashekar [ITA No.1080/Bang/2015 dated September 24, 2021], the current cross objection application by P.H. Chandrashekar ("the Assessee") has

In Income Tax Officer v. Shri Rajeev Ratanlal Tulshyan [I.T.A. No.5748/Mum/2017 A.Y. 2014-15 dated October 01, 2021] [along with cross objection filed by Shri Rajeev Ratanlal Tulshyan("the Respondent")], the Income Tax Officer ("the Appellant") filed

 In Shri Jayaseelan v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2, Tiruvannamalai, [I.T.A No.1455/Chny/2018 dated September 24, 2021], Shri Jayaseelan ("the Appellant") has filed the current appeal being aggrieved against the order dated March 5, 2018 passed by