Income Tax Judgements

The Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-2, Ahmedabad (“CIT(A)” in short) dated 14.08.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2013-14.

In M/S. Frost Falcon Distilleries v. DCIT, Haryana [ITA No.7713/Del/2018 & ITA No.7946/Del/2018 (Cross Appeals) Assessment Year: 2008-09 dated October 07, 2021], M/S. Frost Falcon Distilleries ("Appellant") filed an appeal against Order dated Septemb

In Laxmi D. Gupta v. ITO, Mumbai [I.T.A. No. 6619/Mum/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 dated October 08, 2021], Laxmi Gupta ("the Appellant") filed an appeal impugning Order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ("CIT(A)") dated July 29, 2019 i

Aforesaid appeal by revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-21.

The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 12.11.2018 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2006-07.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A) – 15, Kolkata dated 30.07.2019 whereby he confirmed the penalty of Rs.4,58,376/- imposed by the AO u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act, 1961.

Aforesaid appeals by assessee for Assessment Years (AY) 2009-10 to 2012-13.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 11/12/2019 in the matter of assessment framed by learned Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17 arises out of the order learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-49, Mumbai [CIT(A)], dated 24/01/2020 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143(3) r.w.s

These two appeals are filed by the Revenue against order dated31.05.2016 passed by CIT(A)-23, New Delhi for Assessment Year 2012-13 and 2013-14.