banner_ad

ITAT: Telecom Distributor is exempt from TDS on Commission given directly to Retailers by Service Provider


Last updated: 14 October 2021

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
In Laxmi D. Gupta v. ITO, Mumbai [I.T.A. No. 6619/Mum/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 dated October 08, 2021], Laxmi Gupta ("the Appellant") filed an appeal impugning Order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ("CIT(A)") dated July 29, 2019 in the matter of assessment framed by Assessing Officer ("AO") under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act") on February 22, 2018.

Citation :
I.T.A. No. 6619/Mum/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 dated October 08, 2021

In Laxmi D. Gupta v. ITO, Mumbai [I.T.A. No. 6619/Mum/2019 Assessment Year: 2013-14 dated October 08, 2021], Laxmi Gupta ("the Appellant") filed an appeal impugning Order passed by Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ("CIT(A)") dated July 29, 2019 in the matter of assessment framed by Assessing Officer ("AO") under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the IT Act") on February 22, 2018.

In the case, the Appellant is engaged in distribution of SIM cards and mobile recharge coupons of Uninor. During proceedings, upon perusal of financial statements, the AO disallowed the expenses claimed by the Appellant by holding that the Appellant debited commission of Rs. 40.98 Lacs.

The Appellant explained that they were purchasing the SIM cards and recharge vouchers from Uninor and selling them to around 250 retailers. Uninor was providing incentive to retailers to achieve sale target. However, Uninor would credit the account of the Appellant with incentive and deduct Tax Deduction at Source ("TDS") under Section 194H of the IT Act.

Upon actual payment to the retailers, the account of the Appellant would be debited. Therefore, the amount of incentive was merely routed through the ledger of the Appellant. However, no incentive or commission was received from the Appellant to be paid to the retailers. According to the Appellant, the same was merely book entries for incentive paid by Uninor directly to the retailers.

After taking perusal of all the facts and evidences, the Income Tax Appellate Authority ("ITAT"), Mumbai held that the telecom service provider i.e., Uninor remunerates the Appellant and scores of retailers by way of commission and incentives. The Tribunal therefore, granted relief to the Appellant observed that telecom distributor cannot be liable for TDS on the amount of commission directly paid to the retailers by the telecom service provider.

 

CCI Pro

Bimal Jain
Published in Income Tax
Views : 162

Comments




CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
Audit Assistant / Article Trainee / Intern

SSGS and Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 27 May 2026
Lead Conversion Executive / Sales Closing Executive

SMJ global advisors pvt ltd

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Accounts assistant

Shubh Consultancy

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
19 May 2026
Article, CA & Paid Assistant Positions

Aggarwal Sarawagi and Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 23 May 2026
Article Assistants

Acupro Consulting

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 May 2026
ARTICLE ASSISTANT, TRAINEE AND PAID ASSISTANT

YOGESH KAPOOR AND ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Finance Head

Bhawar Sales Corporation

Chennai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
14 May 2026
Senior Accounts Executive

Karan Gupta & Co.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details