Appeal filed by Anuj Yadav is dismissed considering the option availed by it under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act

Last updated: 12 January 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by Anuj Yadav for the assessment year 2011-12. This decision was made because Mr. Yadav chose to settle his tax dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. However, the dismissal is conditional; if the settlement under the Act is unsuccessful, Mr. Yadav can apply to have his appeal reinstated.

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-20, New Delhi, dated 27.09.2019.

Citation :
ITA No.1491/Del/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 157
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. SC Landmark Ruling: Mechanical Invocation of Fraud Cannot Extend Limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  2. CESTAT Sets Aside ₹60 Crore Service Tax Demand: Best-Judgment Assessment Cannot Be Based on Guesswork
  3. CESTAT: Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake Is a Deposit — Refund Not Barred by Section 11B Limitation
  4. CESTAT Denies Service Tax Exemption on Rent to Educational Institution for Lack of Evidence
  5. CESTAT Upholds Customs Duty Demand on Undervaluation of Imported Goods Based on Chinese Customs Documents
  6. IGST Paid Under a Wrong Head to be Adjusted Against CGST/SGST Liability Before Any Recovery of Tax Interest or Penalty
  7. Assessee entitled to fresh opportunity of hearing where adjudicating authority ignored reply filed to DRC-01A intimation
  8. Typographical Error in the SCN Cannot Be a Shield for the Assessee Who Participated in the Proceedings Without Raising Any Objection
  9. Penalty on partners under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act upheld where complicity in fake invoicing and hawala-linked ITC fraud stands established
  10. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member Prakash MistryPrakash MistryPro Member DSK TMCDSK TMCPro Member Mukesh SinghMukesh SinghPro Member ALOK AGRAWALALOK AGRAWALPro Member SivakumarSivakumar
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category