Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd.

Last updated: 22 December 2020
Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has upheld a Delhi High Court decision to transfer a winding-up proceeding from the High Court to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). This case involved Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd. filing a petition to wind up Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. due to an outstanding debt of Rs. 4.55 crore for goods supplied.

Court :
Supreme Court of India

Brief :
These appeals arise out of a judgment of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 10.10.2019 by which a Single Judge’s order dated 14.01.2019 transferring a winding up proceeding pending before the High Court to the National Company Law Tribunal [“NCLT”] was upheld. The brief facts necessary to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals are as follows:

Citation :
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4041 OF 2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in LAW
Views : 742
downloaded 293 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. No 10% pre-deposit required on any Penalty-only order from SCN issued prior to October 01, 2025
  2. Ratification is no substitute for recommendation - Notifications travelling beyond GST Council recommendations are ultra vires
  3. Disparity between seigniorage fee paid and supply value declared in GSTR-1 justifies invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  4. Interest on Delayed Payment of GST Arises by Operation of Law and Cannot be Waived by Courts
  5. Supreme Court to examine whether the six-month time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 74(2) of the CGST Act is mandatory or directory
  6. Advocates ought to be summoned only in rare and exceptional circumstances
  7. Unsigned Assessment Order in Form GST DRC-07 is Invalid as Absence of the Assessing Officer's Signature is an Incurable Jurisdictional Defect
  8. SC to examine whether an assessee can be relegated to the appellate remedy, when the challenge is to a binding Circular
  9. Mere Expiry of E-Way Bill Without Intent to Evade Tax Cannot Justify 200% Penalty
  10. No GST Levy on Assignment of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots as Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's SLPs

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member vinayvinayPro Member Binod SinghBinod SinghPro Member damodara rao tedladamodara rao tedlaPro Member PARAS CHHAJEDPARAS CHHAJEDPro Member NIKHIL GUPTANIKHIL GUPTA
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Follow