Accepting the additional evidence without calling remand report of AO is the violation of Rule 46A of the IT Rules
Last updated: 02 July 2012
Court :
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Brief :
The facts filed before the first appellate authority indicate that the assessee was retired from Ministry of Defence as Defence Estate Officer long back, from where he was getting his pension. After retirement he had started his own business of sale and purchase of residential plot in and near Delhi, beside that he has rental income and other sources of income. Assessee is filing his tax returns since long and regularly being assessed. Assessee is having dividend income amounting to Rs.13,389/-, which has been claimed exempt income during the year under assessment. Assessee is following mercantile system of accounting and there is no variation in the system during the instant assessment year. Assessee expired on 4trh August, 2008
Citation :
ACIT, Circle 23(1), New Delhi. (Appellant) Vs. Late Avtar Singh Bahl (Through Legal Heir), Mrs. Subhagya Behl, 177C, Janak Puri, New Delhi-110 058 (PAN/GIR No.AAGPB6134L) (Respondent)
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Judgements Access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
CS Bijoy
Published in Income Tax
Views : 2157
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
CAclubindia
