Is Advance Amount forfeited for sale consideration taxable?

Author
View profile
Last updated: 10 July 2021
Quick Summary
This judgement concerns whether an advance amount forfeited by a company, when a sale agreement failed, is taxable as income. The company argued it was a capital receipt and should reduce the property's cost, citing a Supreme Court ruling. The Income Tax Officer viewed the forfeited amount as undeclared income.

Court :
ITAT Bangalore

Brief :
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 4.2.2020 passed by Ld. CIT(A)-1 Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in confirming the addition made by the A.O. u/s 28(iv) of the Act.

Citation :
ITA No.408/Bang/2020

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)

View all CCI PRO benefits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694

 


Guest

Judgement posted by

Guest

View Judgements
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. No Fresh Pre-Deposit for GSTAT Appeal When Earlier Deposit Already Covers 20% of Disputed Tax
  2. CESTAT: Service Tax Demand Based Solely on ITR Data Unsustainable; 40% Valuation Applicable to Original Works Contract
  3. CESTAT: Renting Vehicles on Per-Trip Basis Not Taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods
  4. CESTAT Denies Refund of Ocean Freight Service Tax Claim Filed Beyond Limitation
  5. CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Merely on Form 26AS; Renting of Residential Hostel Held Non-Taxable
  6. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  7. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  8. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  9. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  10. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member shashishashiPro Member B L BhojwaniB L BhojwaniPro Member DHANASHRI KARMARKAR DHANASHRI KARMARKAR Pro Member CA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMCA. K. BRAHMANAYAGAMPro Member CA Varun GuptaCA Varun Gupta
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Paid Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
31 October 2026
Accountants

sankaran and krishnan

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 October 2026
Article assistants

Shyam S Gupta and Company

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
13 November 2026
Chartered Accountant - Fresher

Neeraj Bhagat & Co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 07 November 2026
Chartered Accountant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 29 October 2026
Article Assistant (CA Inter / CMA Inter) - Thrissur

Varma Raja & Associates

Thrissur

CA Inter

View Details
Company
10 November 2026
FP&A Executive

Gujarat Guardian

Ankleshwar

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 November 2026
Article Assisstant

DPV & Associates

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details