Violence of sec. 269ss & 269t

Dear Mr. Khan,

According to me & from what i have understood after reading the provisions of Sec. 269SS & T. you will be paying on behalf of the client, hence this would not come under the perview of Sec 269SS. since you are paying the government of india the provisions of cash transaction are not applicable. Further you should be getting re-imbursed from your client for expenses done by you on his behalf hence this would not be re-payment of loan. therefore sec 269T is also not attracted.

but sec 40A(3) will be applicable on your client if re-imburses you with cash payment.

Your chaalan would have the stamp of the bank in which the money will be deposited, this is proof enough that you have deposited the money on his behalf

I don't think that section 40(A)(3) would get attracted, becasue nothing is being debited to the P&L of the consultant. What he is doing is paying on behalf of the client and geting re-imbursed for that. So consultant is not incurring any expenditure for himself.