Guest
Posted on 30 September 2011
Hi,
To my knowledge this issue is still not resolved and disputes are pending in SC. Therefore, it might be possible that they are charging both (Service tax & VAT) in order to avoid any penalty for short charging of taxes in future as a result of any judgment of SC or any notification issued by CG on this behalf.
I would request others to throw some light on this critical issue...
My observations are as below-
Overlapping entries :
Under Service Tax, tax is levied on :
>>>temporary transfer or permission to use or enjoy the IPR such as Patents, Trade-marks, Designs, etc.; and
>>>transfer of franchise (representational right) to franchisee to sell or manufacture goods or to provide service or undertake any process identified with franchiser.
Under VAT, tax is levied on :
>>>transfer of right to use Patents, Trademarks, Designs, etc. and franchise.