THE REAL HERO

Knowledge resource 1540 views 19 replies

NATHURAM GODSE

Godse is often a misunderstood character. He is referred to as a Hindu fanatic. It is often hard to understand Godse because the Govt. of India had suppressed information about him. His court statements, letters etc. were all banned from the public until recently. Judging from his writings one thing becomes very clear – He was no fanatic. His court statements are very well read out and indicate a calm and collected mental disposition. He never even once speaks ill about Gandhi as a person, but only attacks Gandhi’s policies which caused ruin and untold misery to Hindus. Another interesting point to note is that Godse had been working with the Hindu refugees fleeing from Pakistan. He had seen the horrible atrocities committed on them. Many women had their hands cut off, nose cut off, even little girls had been raped mercilessly. Despite this Godse did not harm even single Muslim in India which he could easily have. So it would be a grave mistake to call him a Hindu fanatic.

Let us start by studying the motive behind Godse’s act. By seeing the nature of the assassination in public space and Godse’s act of turning himself over to the Police, we can see that Godse did not do this for personal reasons. He very well knew that he would be hanged and his name would be disgraced as Gandhi was considered a saint. And again Godse could have ran away and escaped punishment. But he did the reverse. He called a police officer and courted arrest. Before we proceed it would be wise to understand the backdrop of the assassination.

The central government had taken a decision  Pakistan will not be given Rs 55 crores. On January 13 Gandhi started a fast unto death that Pakistan must be given the money. On January 13, the central government changed its earlier decision and announced that Pakistan would be given the amount. On January 13, Nathuram decided to assassinate Gandhi.

Nathuram Godse was a learned man, very sharp and intelligent – editor of “Agrani” (one of the most famous newspaper of that time – with Nana Aapte). In his last editorial of “Agrani” which he changed overnight – he said “Gandhi must be stopped – at any cost” and he justified why Gandhiji’s assassination was not only inevitable but also a delayed action, sth tht shud’ve happened LONG AGO.

In Nathuram’s words – ” I don’t refute Gandhi’s theory of non-violence. He may be a saint but he is not a politician. His theory of non-violence denies self-defence and self-interest. The non-violence that defines the fight for survival as violence is a theory not of non-violence but of self-destruction.The division of the nation was an unnecessary decision. What was the percentage of the Muslim population as compared to the population of the nation? There was no need for a separate nation. Had it been a just demand, Maulana Azad would not have stayed back in India. But because Jinnah insisted and because Gandhi took his side, India was divided, in spite of opposition from the nation, the Cabinet. An individual is never greater than a nation.

In a democracy you cannot put forward your demands at knife-point. Jinnah did it and Gandhi stabbed the nation with the same knife. He dissected the land and gave a piece to Pakistan. We did picket that time but in vain. The Father of our Nation went to perform his paternal duties for Pakistan! Gandhi blackmailed the cabinet with his fast unto death. His body, his threats to die are causing the destruction — geographical as well as economical — of the nation. Today, Muslims have taken a part of the nation, tomorrow Sikhs may ask for Punjab. The religions are again divided into castes, they will demand sub-divisions of the divisions. What remains of the concept of one nation, national integration? Why did we fight the British in unison for independence? Why not separately? Bhagat Singh did not ask only for an independent Punjab or Subhash Chandra Bose for an independent Bengal?

I am going to assassinate him in the open, before the public, because I am going to do it as my duty. If I do it surreptitiously, it becomes a crime in my own eyes. I will not try to escape, I will surrender and naturally I will be hanged. One assassination, one hanging. I don’t want two executions for one assassination and I don’t want your involvement, participation or company. (This was for Nana-Apte and Veer Savarkar as they were against ghandhi’s policies too, Godse wanted to assassinate gandhi all by himself and took promise from Nana Apte that he will continue helping Veer Savarkar in rebuilding India as a strong free nation.)

On January 30, I reached Birla Bhavan at 12 pm. Gandhi was sitting outside on a cot enjoying the sunshine. Vallabhbhai Patel’s granddaughter was sitting at his feet. I had the revolver with me. I could have assassinated him easily then, but I was convinced that his assassination was to be a punishment and a sentence against him, and I would execute him. I wanted witnesses for the execution but there were none. I did not want to escape after the execution as there was not an iota of guilt in my mind. I wanted to surrender, but surrender to whom? There was a good crowd to collect for the evening prayers. I decided on the evening of January 30 as the date for Gandhi’s execution.

Gandhi climbed the steps and came forward. He had kept his hands on the shoulders of the two girls. I wanted just three seconds more. I moved two steps forward and faced Gandhi. Now I wanted to take out the revolver and salute him for whatever sacrifice and service he had made for the nation. One of the two girls was dangerously close to Gandhi and I was afraid that she might be injured in the course of firing. As a precautionary measure I went one more step ahead, bowed before him and gently pushed the girl away from the firing line. The next moment I fired at Gandhi. Gandhi was very weak, there was a feeble sound like ‘aah’ (There are proof that Gandhi did NOT say “Hey Raam” at that time – it’s just made up stuff ) from him and he fell down.

After the firing I raised my hand holding the revolver and shouted, ‘Police, police’. For 30 seconds nobody came forward and I scanned the crowd. I saw a police officer. I signalled to him to come forward and arrest me. He came and caught my wrist, then a second man came and touched the revolver… I let it go…”

Replies (19)

Thank you Onam for sharing the post, had heard and read about Godse that he was not a bad human., but still people dont know about him much. He respected Gandhiji but some of his policies were opposed. He is a real hero who had that guts to shot FATHER OF NATION in public. Thank you Onam for the reminder.

Friends please give your views too.. please

 

 

thanks a lot dear for this post ..... as I used to thought abt  this q a lot .enlightened....

How can some1 kill the other, when some1 respects the other so much ....

It's so true..... when circumstances change, a person hav to do those things which a person never though of .....crying

It takes time to undestand  those circumstances, and till the moment a person understand the circumstances ,

circumstances chage again .

 

 

Its just coincidence, yesterday, dont know what came to my husband's mind, he was reading and talking about Godse, which really putme in puzzle, dont know how to react, I am not that knowledged person to come to any strong belief... Its the mistake of the public, If someone is doing great job, we treat him as god, and someone did something wrong, we label them as criminal.. we often forget they two can do mistakes..., We need to follow good paths shown by them, and we need to learn not to repeat those mistakes done by them.... Thanks for choosing this topic to discuss,

Thank 'U' Ms. Onam, am really happy, that you wrote this article,,,,,,, Godse is misunderstood or not, but Gandhi is surly misunderstood,,, Wanted to write more,,,,, but for many reasons could not or should not,,, But really a nice write-up,,,,,,

Originally posted by : Harini
Its just coincidence, yesterday, dont know what came to my husband's mind, he was reading and talking about Godse, which really putme in puzzle, dont know how to react, I am not that knowledged person to come to any strong belief...
Its the mistake of the public, If someone is doing great job, we treat him as god, and someone did something wrong, we label them as criminal.. we often forget they two can do mistakes..., We need to follow good paths shown by them, and we need to learn not to repeat those mistakes done by them....
Thanks for choosing this topic to discuss,


Ms. Harini, that is not coincidence, it is called synchronicity,

I agree with u Eklavya..

When i read this info, my thinking also changed.. " Thinking for Gandhi ji"

And Just because Godse killed M.K. Gandhi, does that mean he is a bad person?

Atleast know the cause before making any judgment..

Realy wonderful.smile. Thanku for sharing, keep sharing.

And Eklavya.. 1 small correction... Ms. Onam and not Mr. Onam..smiley

thanks a lot dear for this post ..... as I used to thought abt  this q a lot .

 

We all think about it, Dear Renu.

 

Even if my statement runs the risk of being hackneyed, I must say that we are socialised to think that Duryodhanas are made with only the evil elements whereas Yudhisthiras represent Dharma. But there has always been Good in Evil and Evil in Good, and it will continue to be.

 

Dig human history deep, and you will find your long-cherished ideas going for a topsy-turvy - more often than not. So many History Question Papers have remained unanswered !!!

 

 

Gandhiji began to hold his prayer meetings in a Hindu temple in Bhangi Colony and persisted in reading passages from Quoran as a part of the prayer in that Hindu temple in spite of the protest of the Hindu worshippers there. Of course he dared not read the Geeta in a mosque in the teeth of Muslim opposition. He knew what a terrible Muslim reaction would have been if he had done so. But he could safely trample over the feelings of the tolerant Hindu. To belie this belief I was determined to prove to Gandhiji that the Hindu too could be intolerant when his honour was insulted.
 
 
Nathuram Godse, Answer to the Charge Sheet (Para. 35)
This is what Gandhiji had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what the Congress Party calls 'Freedom'. Never in the history of the world has such slaughter been officially connived at or the result described as Freedom, and 'Peaceful Transfer of power' If what happened in India in 1946, 1947 and 1948 is to be called peaceful one wonders what would be the violent. Hindu Muslim Unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic and communal State dissociated from everything that smacked of United India was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called it `Freedom won by them at sacrifice'. Whose sacrifice?
Nathuram Godse, Answer to the Charge Sheet (Excerpt from Para. 69w)
Had this act not been done by me, of course it would have been better for me. But circumstances were beyond my control. So strong was the impulse of my mind that I felt that this man should not be allowed to meet a natural death so that the world may know that he had to pay the penalty of his life for his unjust, anti-national and dangerous favouritism towards a fanatical section of the country. I decided to put an end to this matter and to the further massacre of lacs of Hindus for no fault of theirs. May God now pardon him for his egoistic nature which proved to be too disastrous for the beloved sons of this Holy Land.
Nathuram Godse, Answer to the Charge Sheet (Para. 140)
I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually, but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy, which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.
Nathuram Godse, Answer to the Charge Sheet (Excerpt from Para. 135)
Finally, I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof someday in future.
Nathuram Godse, Answer to the Charge Sheet (Para. 150)

Its My Opinion..... i recommend to watch "Gandhi" of Ben Kingsley to get clear idea......

Gandhiji never wanted division of India. it was all pre-plaaned by jinnah and jawaharlal nehru. few people know that cause of India’s division is nehru and jinnah themselves and not Gandhiji.....

first of all, Gandhiji was not a politician so u people must learn that he just wanted peace. jinnah had threatned to raise more communal violence.

if you are supporting godse you are supporting the violence. killing had never been the solution to any problem. Gandhiji is known as FATHER OF NATION and it includes whole of the wold. he wanted peace everywhere and not only pakistan.

he loved pakistan and India equally coz once all were the same. so you people stop worshipping godse coz if it would have not done the killing gandhiji would have done more for the nation. !!!!

History is always stories which received majority concent.It may be true, may be false.

With all due respect, Sanket iss article me kahi nai likha ki Gandhi was a politician..

Rather its denying over it..

However Nathuram Godse killed him because Gandhi had started a never ending fast to give an amount of Rs. 55 crores to Pakistan..

Which was not acceptable as per his terms..

And kindly read eklavya's post too on page 2..

Rest its upto u..

And i m not saying Gandhi has done nothing for India..

But the thing is he gave priority to muslims over hindus..

Please refer eklavya's post too..

Thank u..smiley

 


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register