Analyst
913 Points
Joined January 2010
| Originally posted by : Amir |
 |
Dear Rachit Bro.,
Ur view might be right.........!
Intially I was also thinking on same lines but then recent judgment of Delhi HC in case of VAN Oord ACZ where it is held that "Liability to deduct TDS u/s 195 cannot be avioded on the ground that receipt was not chargeable under Income Tax Act (especially by the deductor on its own)"
https://www.simpletaxindia.org/2010/03/tds-us-1951-if-non-resident-income.html
I would say better to go for certificate u/s 195(2) |
 |
Dear Amir Bro,
It seems that you have mis-read the Delhi High Court judgement in the case of Van Oord Acz India (P) Ltd. This judgement on the contrary is a favourable judgement. It is relaxation from the rigours of Karnatak HC's ruling in Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
In this landmark ruling of Van Oord the Delhi HC has held that the obligation to deduct tax at source arises only if the no-resident's income is chargeable to tax in India. The rationale adopted by the Delhi HC was based on two facts : that the subject reimbursements did no constitute income and that the assessment of the foreign recipient has been completed without further tax liability.
I agree with your suggestion of making an application u/s 195(2) & getting a NOC certificate from AO.
But from my personal experience I find that in more than 90% cases the certificates issued are biased towards the revenue and against the assessee.
Since the issue is litigative it for the assessee to take a call on whether to be conservative or the other way round.