Practice
1205 Points
Joined June 2011
.
It will be chargeable u/s 194J as Royalty.
I Would like to give you reference of the case “ CIT vs Estel Communication P Ltd.(2009) 318ITR(Del.)” where in similar circumstances court came to conclusion that there were no technical services provided by service provider to the service receiver and the provision of section 9(1)(vii) {Technical Service} of the Act did not apply.
But then Finance Act, 2012 has inserted explanation 6 in Section 9(1)(vi) which is related to Royalty, whereby government has made retrospective amendment from 01.06.1976.
Explanation 6.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby clarified that the expression “process” includes and shall be deemed to have always included transmission by satellite (including up-linking, amplification, conversion for down-linking of any signal), cable, optic fibre or by any other similar technology, whether or not such process is secret;
This Explanation has reversed the judgment of delhi high court. And now internet lease line will be covered under Royalty.
Wait for Expert Suggestion and Advise
Regards